Benediction
By Kent Haruf
I just finished reading the novel Benediction by Kent
Haruf. My initial reaction is mixed.
I chose this book because the subject matter, life
and death, have been on my mind a lot lately. The first week of December, on a Tuesday night, I got the
call that a dear friend and surrogate grandmother had passed away. Wednesday
morning I received an email that my uncle had passed. Finally,
my father has stage five terminal cancer, though he is doing fairly well at the
moment. You would think that would make me
run from the story of a father dying of terminal cancer but all of this
drew me toward it.
I’ve done a lot of
writing considering all of this and I’m still looking for answers. I
am the youngest of five at age thirty-nine. At this point in my life, I feel less certain about whether our consciousness
survives after death. I was once secure in my faith and beliefs but now I’m not
so certain.
There were a couple scenes in Benediction that hit me hard and really moved me.
Dad Lewis has just been told he is dying of cancer,
and it’s going to happen quickly. His wife, Mary, is wearing herself out taking
care of him all alone and she passes out. When he gets down on the floor beside
her, scared for her, I cried. The prose is sparse and honest.
He
got down on his knees beside her and felt her head. She felt hot. He pulled her
toward him and slid his arms under her, propping her up against the couch. Can you
hear me? I got to call somebody. I’ll be right back. She made no sign. Is that
all right with you if I leave a minute? I’m coming right back. He hurried out
to the kitchen and called the emergency number at the hospital. Then he
returned and got down on the floor again and held her and talked to her softly
and kissed her cheek and brushed back her damp white hair and patted her arm
and waited.
Another scene was when the preacher gets up in front
of the church and tells the congregation that Christ’s sermon about turning the
other cheek wasn’t just a metaphor but something that we need to live even in
these turbulent times. The majority of
the congregation don’t take that so well.
But
then he was abruptly halted. Someone out in the congregation was talking. Are
you crazy? You must be insane! A man’s voice. Deep-throated. Angry. Loud.
Coming from over on the west side of the sanctuary near the windows. What’s
wrong with you? Are you out of your mind?
Now, this was only the second book that I’ve read
from the modern era that did not use quotes to set off dialogue. It wasn’t
totally foreign to me but to be honest I wasn’t aware that there were a number
of authors doing this.
I thought the lack of quotation marks was difficult
to follow at first in Benediction but I was soon okay with it. It gave the book
an internal and even timeless feeling, as if looking at events that happened through
frosted glass.
I wondered why someone would choose not to use quote
marks to delineate dialogue so I did a quick search online and found an article
from Lionel Shriver on the Wall Street Journal. Apparently a number of modern
authors, including James Frey, Kent Heruf and Cormac McCarthy are popularizing
the trend.
Shriver contends “By putting the onus on the reader
to determine which lines are spoken and which not, the quoteless fad feeds the
widespread conviction that popular fiction is fun while literature is arduous.”
I also came upon a discussion by authors on this
topic that pointed me to an interview Cormac McCarthy had done with Oprah some
years ago in which he said that, “If you write properly you shouldn’t have to punctuate.”
Here’s one of my prime problems with it. I have no
problem reading dialect and dialogue without quotation marks. I’m a very fast
reader and can adapt. However, I know people that cannot read dialect at all,
can’t read Mark Twain. Their brains simply don’t translate the written word
into sound in their head. Writing is about communicating. Anything that gets
between the reader and the story inhibits that communication. Now, I know that
not every book is for every reader but my goal as a writer is to make things
more understandable, not to obfuscate.
I asked my writer’s group about this last night. One
of the group said that a good story will not be brought down by poor grammar or
punctuation. Another member said she wouldn’t be able to get past the first few
pages. Yet another threw something on the floor in disgust and said that it was
sheer laziness on the author’s part.
I think I’ll continue to use quotation marks in
writing dialogue but I won’t reject a book right away if the author doesn’t use
them.
Honestly, after reading the ending, I set down the book
and thought, what the hell was that?
The ending really just didn’t seem consistent with the rest of the book to me.
I’m going to have to puzzle on it for a while longer, but I did enjoy the book.
It was about life. Death is part of that too. I didn’t find any answers, but I
did enjoy the time spent on it.
No comments:
Post a Comment